Risks associated with blood transfusions are to be scrutinized in a new national project that will inform public policy on the process.
Researchers led by the University of Leicester will examine the risks and benefits of receiving blood or blood products- and will consider the need for patients to give informed consent, if possible, before receiving blood.
Funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, the work involves collaboration between Dr Helen Busby at the University of Leicester, Professor Julie Kent at the University of the West of England, Bristol and Dr Anne-Maree Farrell at the University of Manchester.
Dr Busby said the research was important because it fed into current debate on issues relating to blood transfusion:
“Although receiving blood has become progressively safer, some risks are involved. These risks are statistically small, and those involved in blood banking have long been involved in anticipating and managing risks of blood transfusion. Whilst much has been achieved in this field, new challenges have emerged. For example, for policy makers in the United Kingdom, managing the risk of transmission of Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease in donated blood is currently an important priority. Regulation and governance of the international blood supply is an international and national activity aimed at protecting public health.
“In the past it has been difficult for lay people to access information about blood products, and stigma about certain diseases intensified this problem. In keeping with contemporary policies that emphasise patient involvement in health services, there is now an expectation that there will be more information for all interested in their treatment. This extends to the risks and benefits of receiving blood.
“There is also currently discussion nationally about whether it would be appropriate for patients to be asked to give their informed consent to receiving blood or blood products, where possible, as is required for many other medical interventions. This research project is therefore both timely and is expected to inform policy debate. It will also enhance understanding of the ways in which we think about risk and safety issues associated with blood transfusion and international blood economies.”
The project aims to look at how people frame risk and safety in blood services in the UK and aims to provide a sociologically informed analysis of public understandings, professional practice, public policy, and law in relation to risks in the supply of blood products in the UK.
The researchers will undertake innovative qualitative research about how patients, professionals, and regulators approach important questions about risk when thinking about treatments with blood products.
NOTE TO NEWSDESK:
For more information, please contact Ather Mirza , University of Leicester Press Office; tel: 0116 252 3335 ; email: firstname.lastname@example.org
ABOUT THE ESRC
The ESRC is the UK’s largest organisation for funding research on economic and social issues. It supports independent, high quality research which has an impact on business, the public sector and the third sector. The ESRC’s total budget for 2010/11 is £128 million. At any one time the ESRC supports over 4,000 researchers and postgraduate students in academic institutions and independent research institutes. More at: www.esrc.ac.uk