10:19pm Tuesday 23 October 2018

Protein analysis uncovers new medulloblastoma subtypes

Research team shows the power of proteomics to discover new drug targets and help develop therapeutic strategies with fewer long-term side effects.

Leah Eisenstadt | Broad Institute

Two patients with the same kind of tumor can have very different experiences. One patient’s cancer may progress quickly while the other grows slowly. Treatments may shrink tumors or have no effect at all. And some patients survive while others don’t.

Efforts to profile tumors at the DNA, RNA, or epigenetic levels have revealed subtypes of tumors that help oncologists diagnose and prognose cancer, but it’s often unclear how to turn that molecular knowledge into new therapeutics. The problem is especially acute for cancers with no clear genetic cause like medulloblastoma, a pediatric brain tumor with toxic treatments and unpredictable outcomes. Now a new effort to look beyond the genome and analyze the tumor’s proteins — the functional players of the cell — has revealed previously unrecognized subtypes of medulloblastoma that could be relevant in the clinic.

Led by scientists at MIT, Boston Children’s Hospital, and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, the study combined clinical, technical, and bioinformatic expertise to show that “multi-omic” approaches aimed at not just genetic material, but also proteins and their modifications, can discover new biomarkers or drug targets.

“We have known since the early days of molecular biology that critical regulatory events take place after genes are transcribed into proteins,” says Ernest Fraenkel, a co-senior author of the new paper, an associate member of the Broad Institute, and professor of biological engineering at MIT. “It’s always been a high priority to look for these events in cancer.”

The researchers describe their findings in the journal Cancer Cell. They have also generated a rich dataset and shared it with the scientific community.

To systematically examine protein modifications in medulloblastoma, the team began by collecting 45 samples of the tumor, with clinical leadership from co-senior author Scott Pomeroy, who is neurologist-in-chief at Boston Children’s Hospital and the Bronson Crothers Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, and co-first author Tenley Archer, a postdoctoral researcher at Children’s Hospital.

The samples were sent to a team in the Broad Institute Proteomics Platform, led by platform senior director and co-senior author Steven Carr. With leadership from co-first author Filip Mundt, the team used a workflow developed at the Broad to perform global measurement of the tumors’ proteins, as well as several ways in which proteins can be modified in the cell after they’re made, such as phosphorylation and acetylation. This proteomics data was then integrated with global measurements of the DNA and RNA by Broad proteomics computational scientists D.R. Mani and Karsten Krug in collaboration with the German Cancer Research Center.

“Recent advances in proteomic technology, especially with respect to analyses of modifications like phosphorylation, enabled us to conduct one of the most comprehensive proteomic studies of medulloblastoma to date, giving us a deeper view of this disease than we could get using genomic methods alone,” says Carr.

Although only a few dozen samples were tested, the results include hundreds of thousands of diverse measurements. This complex dataset was analyzed by a team of computational biologists led by co-senior author Jill Mesirov, a Broad senior institute fellow and professor of medicine at the University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, and Ernest Fraenkel.

Within the four existing subgroups of medulloblastoma — wingless (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), group 3, and group 4 — the researchers found new subtypes.

“Adding data on proteins and their modifications allowed us to see differences in medulloblastoma tumor sub-groups that we can’t see through RNA analyses,” says Pomeroy.

The data showed that group 3 tumors can be divided into two subtypes, including one that is driven by mutations related to the MYC oncogene and has very poor prognosis.

“Notably, the proteomic data improved our ability to stratify the group-3, poorest outcome patients, compared to our previous work using gene expression data,” says Mesirov.

Proteomic analysis of SHH tumors showed different sets of activated pathways. One subtype was strongly driven by the sonic hedgehog pathway, and the other not as much.

To help interpret the data, Fraenkel and co-first author Tobias Ehrenberger led development of a new approach to predict key regulatory proteins that caused changes seen in the proteomic data. Dubbed “kinome analysis,” the methods led them to discover a protein, PRKDC, that when inactivated made one subtype of the tumors more sensitive to radiation treatment.

“Kinome analysis suggested potential therapeutic avenues for type 3 medulloblastoma, a subtype that is known to have poor outcomes — namely, a target that may sensitize tumor cells to radiation,” Pomeroy says.

Fraenkel says patients with medulloblastoma “need better treatments.”

“We hope that insights from this study may lead to therapeutic strategies that result in fewer long-term side effects,” he says.

 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

 


Share on:
or:

MORE FROM Cancers

Health news