The study appears online September 9, 2013 in the American Journal of Epidemiology.
“With increasing numbers of blacks entering professional and management roles in numerous industries, it is important to investigate and address the social factors contributing to the short sleep disparities in blacks compared with whites in general, and particularly in professional settings,” said lead author Chandra Jackson, Yerby postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Nutrition at HSPH.
The researchers analyzed eight years of data, from 2004-2011, from nearly 137,000 U.S. adults who participated in the National Health Interview Survey. Workers from the U.S. Census Bureau interviewed survey participants about their health, lifestyles, jobs, and socioeconomic status. Based on self-reports, 30% of the respondents were considered “short sleepers,” sleeping less than 7 hours a night; 31% were “optimal sleepers,” sleeping about 7 hours a night; and 39% were “long sleepers,” sleeping more than 7 hours a night.
After adjusting for various factors, including age, demographic factors, health behaviors such as smoking and alcohol consumption, physical activity, medical conditions, and socioeconomic status, the researchers found that black workers in general—and black professionals in particular—were more likely to experience short sleep than whites. Among black respondents, 37% were short sleepers; among whites, 28%.
In all industries combined, blacks working in professional or management positions were more likely to experience short sleep than their white counterparts (42% vs. 26%). Blacks working in support services were also more likely to experience short sleep than whites (37% vs. 26%), as were laborers, (35% vs. 32%). The only industries in which blacks and whites had similar rates of short sleep were retail and food.
The social and work environment can affect sleep, say the authors. Possible sleep-disrupting factors that affect blacks more than whites include job strain; discrimination or harassment in the workplace, which can increase stress; limited control over job demands or prestige; limited professional and social networks providing emotional or financial support; long work hours; and greater home stress. In addition, blacks are more likely than whites to do shift work, often at night, which can disrupt circadian rhythms and increase their appetite for sweet and salty foods. They are also more likely to live in urban neighborhoods with high noise levels at night.
It’s also possible, the researchers wrote, that a high work ethic among blacks—a strong desire to succeed against all odds—could lead to stress, disrupted sleep, and negative health effects. This phenomenon is known as “John Henryism,” referring to a coping strategy in which individuals, beset by stress and social discrimination, expend enormous effort to achieve success—but can end up damaging their health in the process.
Given the findings that blacks in general, and black professionals in particular, are likely to sleep less than their white counterparts, the authors said that more investigation is needed—both to help explain the disparities and to eventually help tailor interventions to improve sleep among those who aren’t getting enough.
Other authors included Ichiro Kawachi, HSPH professor of social epidemiology and chair, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences; Michelle Williams, Steven B. Kay Family Professor of Public Health at HSPH and chair, Department of Epidemiology; Susan Redline of Brigham and Women’s Hospital; and Frank Hu, HSPH professor of nutrition and epidemiology.
Support for the study came from TREC (Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer), a research effort focused on obesity and cancer funded by the National Cancer Institute.
“Racial disparities in short sleep duration by occupation and industry: John Henryism in black professionals?” Chandra L. Jackson, Susan Redline, Ichiro Kawachi, Michelle A. Williams, and Frank B. Hu, American Journal of Epidemiology, online September 9, 2013
For more information:
Harvard School of Public Health brings together dedicated experts from many disciplines to educate new generations of global health leaders and produce powerful ideas that improve the lives and health of people everywhere. As a community of leading scientists, educators, and students, we work together to take innovative ideas from the laboratory and the classroom to people’s lives—not only making scientific breakthroughs, but also working to change individual behaviors, public policies, and health care practices. Each year, more than 400 faculty members at HSPH teach 1,000-plus full-time students from around the world and train thousands more through online and executive education courses. Founded in 1913 as the Harvard-MIT School of Health Officers, the School is recognized as America’s first professional training program in public health.