The study, which will appear in the February issue of the journal Ecology Letters, informs the development of personalised family planning and preventative medicine strategies for dealing with cardiovascular problems – and even some cancers.
Current evolutionary theory suggests that menopause was favoured among our ancestors because it let women focus on bringing up their relatives’ children, with whom they shared genes in common.
“But our ecology meant that a woman would typically be more related to her neighbours through her father than through her mother”, explains Dr Andy Gardner, an evolutionary biologist at the University of St Andrews. “So while the genes she got from her father would be happy for her to give up her reproduction in this way, the genes she got from her mother would be less happy.”
This conflict of interest within a women’s genome could explain why the menopausal transition is so turbulent.
“The woman’s paternal genes are pushing for an earlier menopause, while her maternal genes are trying to stall the process”, points out Francisco Úbeda of Royal Holloway University, who led the study. “Our mathematical model predicts that this conflict will lead to chaotic gene expression regulated by epigenetic factors, which is when gene expression is determined by factors other than the underlying DNA sequence”.
The possibility that the genes underpinning menopause are epigenetically regulated can help researchers identify genetic markers for associated disorders, such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers.
The research also suggests novel applications in family planning, personalised according to a woman’s genetic background. “Choosing if and when to start a family is one of the biggest decisions that we have to make in our lives”, says Dr Úbeda. “Having better, individualized information about when our fertility is likely to tail off will help avoid anxiety and make sure that people don’t leave it too late”.
Note to Editors
The authors of this study are Francisco Ubeda (Royal Holloway University, UK), Hisashi Ohtsuki (Sokendai, Japan) and Andy Gardner (University of St Andrews, UK). All three are evolutionary theorists, with Drs Ubeda & Gardner specialising in kin selection theory and Dr Ohtsuki specialising in evolutionary game theory. The research was supported by the Royal Society of London.
The paper will be available online from Tuesday 10 December at http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ele.12208