Deakin University research finds over eating alone explains the obesity epidemic in the United States

Professor Boyd Swinburn worked with researchers from Pennington Biomedical Research Centre in the US to determine how much of the obesity epidemic had been caused by excess calorie intake and how much by reductions in physical activity.

“There have been a lot of assumptions that both reduced physical activity and increased energy intake have been major drivers of the obesity epidemic. Until now, nobody has proposed how to quantify their relative contributions to the rise in obesity since the 1970s. This study demonstrates that the weight gain in the American population seems to be virtually all explained by eating more calories. It appears that reductions in physical activity played a minimal role,” Professor Swinburn said.

While this study used US data, Professor Swinburn believes that a similar situation is likely to apply in Australia. However, for developing countries undergoing rapid economic transition and urbanisation, it is likely that reduced physical activity is playing a larger role in their obesity epidemic.

The study is the first to examine the question of the proportional contributions to the obesity epidemic by combining metabolic relationships, the laws of thermodynamics, epidemiological data and agricultural data.

By analysing a range of data, the researchers predicted how much weight they would expect Americans to have gained over the 30-year period studied if food intake was the only influence and compared that to actual weight gain over that time.

The researchers found that in children, the predicted and actual weight increase matched exactly, indicating that the increases in energy intake alone over the 30-years studied could explain the weight increase.

“For children, the predicted weight gain of 4.0 kg matched the actual weight gain, and for adults, the predicted weight gain of 10.8 kg was a little more than the actual gain of 8.6 kg,” Professor Swinburn said.

“To return to the average weights of the 1970s, we would need to reverse the increased food intake of about 350 calories a day for children (about one can of soft drink and a small portion of French fries) and almost 500 calories a day for adults (about one large hamburger).

“Alternatively, we could achieve similar results by increasing physical activity by about 150 minutes a day of extra walking for children and 110 minutes for adults, but realistically, although a combination of both is needed, the focus would have to be on reducing calorie intake.”

Professor Swinburn emphasised that physical activity should not be ignored as a contributor to reducing obesity and should continue to be promoted because of its many other benefits, but that expectations regarding what can be achieved with exercise need to be lowered and public health policy shifted more toward reducing excess energy intake.

Media contact

Rebecca Tucker
Media and Corporate Communications
03 5227 8568, 0418 979 134