“Australia is proud of its principle of giving people a ‘fair go’. It seems only fair someone injured by a vaccine which has been offered and accepted in good faith to benefit the community should be compensated by that community,” said Professor Isaacs.
“It’s certainly a better solution than having people not immunise their children and so expose the whole community to a virus.”
Professor Isaacs’ suggestion follows an international seminar at the University of Sydney held yesterday in which Marie Bismark, a researcher in public health originally from New Zealand, described the successful operation of no-fault compensation schemes in her country.
There was unanimous support for such a scheme from all attendees.
“In fact 19 countries around the world have accepted that society owes a duty of care, or gratitude, to the very few individuals damaged by a vaccine and have introduced no-fault vaccine compensation schemes. Germany has had such a scheme for 50 years; the United States, Britain and most other European countries all have compensation schemes in place.
“Serious adverse events are much more common as an outcome of a natural disease but in those very rare cases where they are a result of a vaccine compensation should be available,” Professor Isaacs said.
“Is it fair that a family suffers because their child was inadvertently injured, through nobody’s fault, by a vaccine sanctioned and paid for by the Australian community?”
Overseas schemes cost relatively little and are funded by one of four methods:
- a vaccine tax
- special funding for the scheme from general taxes
- industry contribution
- compensation as part of a broader national compensation scheme
Media enquiries: Verity Leatherdale, 02 9351 4312, 0403 067 342, email@example.com