- Comprehensive smoke-free laws were associated with a rapid 15 percent decrease in hospitalizations for heart attacks, 16 percent for stroke and24 percent for asthma and other respiratory hospitalizations.
- The most comprehensive laws — those covering workplaces, restaurants and bars — resulted in more health benefits.
Researchers reviewed 45 studies covering 33 smoke-free laws at the local and state levels around the United States and from countries as varied as Uruguay, New Zealand and
Germany and found:
- Comprehensive smoke-free laws were associated with a rapid 15 percent decrease in heart attack hospitalizations and 16 percent decrease in stroke hospitalizations.
- Smoke-free laws were also rapidly followed by a 24 percent decrease in hospitalizations for respiratory diseases, including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- The most comprehensive laws — those covering workplaces, restaurants and bars — resulted in the highest health benefits.
“The public, health professionals and policy makers need to understand that including exemptions and loopholes in legislation – such as exempting casinos – condemns more people to end up in emergency rooms,” said Stanton Glantz, Ph.D., senior study author and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at the University of California, San Francisco. “These unnecessary hospitalizations are the real cost of failing to enact comprehensive smoke-free legislation.”
The findings support the American Heart Association’s position that smoke-free laws should be comprehensive and apply to all workplaces and public environments, including restaurants, bars and casinos. The analysis also is consistent with other studies that have found smoke-free laws were followed by significant decreases in acute heart attack and other cardiac-related hospital admissions.
“Stronger legislation means immediate reductions in secondhand smoke-related health problems as a byproduct of reductions in secondhand smoke exposure and increases in smoking cessation that accompany these laws,” Glantz said. “Passage of these laws formalize and accelerate social change and the associated immediate health benefits.”
Crystal E. Tan, M.S., a medical student at UCSF, is co-author of the study.
Author disclosures are on the manuscript.
The National Cancer Institute funded the study.
Follow @HeartNews on Twitter for the latest heart and stroke news.
For stroke science, follow the Stroke journal at @StrokeAHA_ASA .
Statements and conclusions of study authors published in American Heart Association scientific journals are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the association’s policy or position. The association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. The association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific association programs and events. The association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and device corporations are available at www.heart.org/corporatefunding .
Additional resources, including multimedia, are available on the right column of this link:
For Media Inquiries: (214) 706-1173
Darcy Spitz: (212) 878-5940; Darcy.Spitz@heart.org
Julie Del Barto (broadcast): (214) 706-1330; Julie.DelBarto@heart.org
For Public Inquiries: (800) AHA-USA1 (242-8721)